Last Updated: 2026-01-27
At Whois 101 – Domains, identity, and privacy explained simply., we are committed to accuracy and transparency in our reporting about domaining. This Fact-Checking Policy outlines our rigorous approach to verifying information and ensuring the reliability of our content.
Our Commitment to Accuracy
We believe that accurate information is the foundation of trust between us and our readers. Our fact-checking process is designed to identify and correct errors before publication and to address any inaccuracies that may be identified after publication.
Fact-Checking Process
Primary Source Verification
- We prioritize primary sources whenever possible
- Original documents, official statements, and direct interviews are preferred
- We verify the authenticity and reliability of primary sources
- Chain of custody for source materials is documented
Multiple Source Corroboration
- Key claims and statistics are verified through multiple independent sources
- Conflicting information is investigated and resolved
- We assess the credibility and expertise of each source
- Source diversity is sought to minimize bias
Expert Consultation
- Subject matter experts are consulted for complex topics
- Technical claims are reviewed by qualified professionals
- Medical and health information is verified by healthcare experts
- Legal information is reviewed by legal professionals when appropriate
Data and Statistics Verification
- All numerical data is verified from original sources
- Statistical methods are reviewed for accuracy
- Survey results are examined for methodology and sample size
- Charts and graphs are cross-referenced with source data
Content Categories and Verification Standards
News and Current Events
- Breaking news is verified through multiple reliable sources
- Official statements and press releases are confirmed
- eyewitness accounts are corroborated when possible
- Timeline accuracy is verified for event reporting
Health and Medical Information
- Medical claims are verified against peer-reviewed research
- Health recommendations are cross-referenced with official guidelines
- Medical expert opinions are sought for complex topics
- Treatment information includes appropriate disclaimers
Financial and Economic Data
- Financial figures are verified from official sources
- Market data is cross-referenced with multiple financial platforms
- Economic analysis is reviewed by financial experts
- Investment advice includes appropriate risk disclosures
Technical and Scientific Content
- Scientific claims are verified against peer-reviewed studies
- Technical specifications are confirmed with manufacturers or official sources
- Research methodology is examined for validity
- Scientific consensus is distinguished from individual studies
Source Evaluation Criteria
We evaluate sources based on the following criteria:
- Authority: Expertise and credentials of the source
- Accuracy: Track record of reliability and precision
- Objectivity: Lack of bias and balanced presentation
- Currency: Timeliness and relevance of information
- Coverage: Comprehensiveness and depth of information
- Verifiability: Ability to independently confirm claims
Correction Policy
Identifying Errors
- We monitor reader feedback for potential errors
- Internal reviews regularly assess content accuracy
- External fact-checking services may be utilized
- Peer review processes help identify inaccuracies
Correction Process
- Reports of errors are investigated promptly
- Corrections are verified through independent fact-checking
- Significant corrections are clearly marked in content
- Correction notices explain the nature and impact of errors
Transparency in Corrections
- All corrections are documented and dated
- Readers are notified of significant corrections
- Original erroneous information is archived when appropriate
- Correction history is maintained for accountability
Fact-Checking Team and Resources
Our fact-checking process involves:
- Trained fact-checkers with expertise in domaining
- Access to reputable fact-checking databases and services
- Partnerships with subject matter experts and institutions
- Regular training on fact-checking best practices
- Subscription to reliable news and information services
Reader Participation
We encourage our readers to help us maintain accuracy by:
- Reporting potential errors or inaccuracies
- Providing additional context or information
- Suggesting corrections or improvements
- Sharing expertise when relevant to specific topics
Continuous Improvement
We regularly review and update our fact-checking processes to:
- Incorporate new verification technologies and methods
- Address emerging challenges in information accuracy
- Respond to feedback from readers and experts
- Maintain alignment with industry best practices
Contact for Fact-Checking Inquiries
If you have questions about our fact-checking process or believe you have identified content that requires verification or correction, please contact us. We take all fact-checking inquiries seriously and respond promptly to ensure the accuracy and reliability of our content.
This Fact-Checking Policy is reviewed regularly and updated as needed to reflect our ongoing commitment to accuracy and transparency in our reporting about domaining.